Alternatives
Conducttr alternatives (2026)
The highest-scoring alternatives to Conducttr on our weights are Immersive Labs (7.5 of 10), Reflex Security (6.8) and Hack The Box (6.7). Conducttr scores 6.1 and ranks 7 of 7. If Conducttr's lowest-scoring criterion, hands-on depth (1), is why you are looking, Immersive Labs, Hack The Box and Cyberbit score highest there (9).
Editorial assessment · Assessed from vendor sites, product pages and published pricing, September 2026
A-1Why do teams look for Conducttr alternatives?
These are facts from Conducttr's public pages, not complaints from users.
- You design and run the exercise yourself in the Scenario Editor; templates and an AI assistant help, but it is not a one-click scenario.
- Behavioural assessment is a paid add-on (Assessment Toolkit, from £4,536 a year).
- Its content is general crisis content rather than cyber-specific, and there is no technical training.
Conducttr is weakest on hands-on depth (1) and effort to run (5) in our assessment.
A-2How do the alternatives rank?
1. Immersive Labs
Top pick for one platform across every audience7.5 of 10Where it beats Conducttr: realism (8 to 7), evidence (8 to 6), effort to run (7 to 5), hands-on depth (9 to 1) and breadth and free access (9 to 5)
Where Conducttr is still better: pricing (10 to 1)
Ties: cross-team
The broadest platform here: hands-on labs, a live-fire range on your own tools, cyber drills and crisis simulations under one product, Immersive One.
2. Reflex Security
Top pick for replacing the annual tabletop6.8 of 10Where it beats Conducttr: realism (9 to 7), cross-team (9 to 8), evidence (8 to 6), effort to run (9 to 5) and hands-on depth (2 to 1)
Where Conducttr is still better: breadth and free access (5 to 2) and pricing (10 to 1)
AI crisis simulation that replaces the scripted tabletop: an adaptive adversary, pressured stakeholders and an after-action report at the end.
=3. Hack The Box
Best for technical teams that also need a tabletop6.7 of 10Where it beats Conducttr: evidence (7 to 6), hands-on depth (9 to 1) and breadth and free access (8 to 5)
Where Conducttr is still better: realism (7 to 6), cross-team (8 to 7) and pricing (10 to 6)
Ties: effort to run
Technical training platform with a large learner community, plus Crisis Control, a platform-led tabletop with optional hands-on investigation.
=3. iluminr
Top pick for board and regulator evidence6.7 of 10Where it beats Conducttr: cross-team (9 to 8), evidence (9 to 6), effort to run (8 to 5), hands-on depth (2 to 1) and breadth and free access (6 to 5)
Where Conducttr is still better: pricing (10 to 1)
Ties: realism
Operational resilience exercising for boards, executives and crisis teams, from 3–5 minute microsimulations to facilitated tabletops, with evidence mapped to regulations.
=3. Cyberbit
Best live-fire range with an executive add-on6.7 of 10Where it beats Conducttr: evidence (7 to 6), hands-on depth (9 to 1) and breadth and free access (7 to 5)
Where Conducttr is still better: pricing (10 to 1)
Ties: realism, cross-team and effort to run
Cloud cyber range for SOC and IR teams, now combined with RangeForce, with Crisis Sim 360 as an add-on that pulls executives into the same incident.
6. TryHackMe
Best free starting point for SOC skills6.5 of 10Where it beats Conducttr: evidence (7 to 6), effort to run (8 to 5), hands-on depth (8 to 1) and breadth and free access (9 to 5)
Where Conducttr is still better: realism (7 to 6), cross-team (8 to 5) and pricing (10 to 3)
Browser-based labs with a free tier and 8M+ users, plus AI-generated tabletop exercises and SOC simulators for business teams.
A-3Which alternative fits which gap?
| Criterion | Conducttr score | Best alternative on this criterion |
|---|---|---|
| Realism (22%) | 7 | Reflex Security (9) |
| Cross-team (20%) | 8 | Reflex Security and iluminr (9) |
| Evidence (16%) | 6 | iluminr (9) |
| Effort to run (14%) | 5 | Reflex Security (9) |
| Hands-on depth (12%) | 1 | Immersive Labs, Hack The Box and Cyberbit (9) |
| Breadth and free access (8%) | 5 | Immersive Labs and TryHackMe (9) |
| Pricing (8%) | 10 | Hack The Box (6) |
A-4When should you stay with Conducttr?
Stay with Conducttr if you have an exercise designer who wants control of every inject and simulated news and social media, and you value a published price list. It scores 10 on pricing and 8 on cross-team, its two highest criteria.
A-5Frequently asked questions
What is the best alternative to Conducttr?
On our weights, Immersive Labs scores highest among the alternatives at 7.5 of 10. The best fit depends on your gap: Immersive Labs, Hack The Box and Cyberbit are strongest on hands-on depth, where Conducttr scores lowest.
Is there a free alternative to Conducttr?
Hack The Box: HTB Academy free start; Lite plan 14-day free trial. TryHackMe: Free individual tier. CISA also publishes over 100 free Tabletop Exercise Packages, which are templates you run yourself rather than a platform.
Does Conducttr publish its price?
Conducttr: £11,950 to £25,725 per year (four team licences, up to 40 participants per session).
Sources: conducttr.com, conducttr.com/pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026