Compare
Conducttr vs Cyberbit
Cyberbit scores higher overall on our weights, 6.7 of 10 to 6.1. Conducttr leads on pricing (10 to 1); Cyberbit leads on evidence (7 to 6), hands-on depth (9 to 1) and breadth and free access (7 to 5). They tie on realism, cross-team and effort to run.
Editorial assessment · Assessed from vendor sites, product pages and published pricing, September 2026
Editorial verdict
Conducttr for a published price to budget against before a sales call; Cyberbit for hands-on labs or range work for analysts and responders.
11-1How do they score?
| Criterion | Conducttr | Cyberbit |
|---|---|---|
| Realism (22%) | 7Tie | 7Tie |
| Cross-team (20%) | 8Tie | 8Tie |
| Evidence (16%) | 6 | 7Higher |
| Effort to run (14%) | 5Tie | 5Tie |
| Hands-on depth (12%) | 1 | 9Higher |
| Breadth and free access (8%) | 5 | 7Higher |
| Pricing (8%) | 10Higher | 1 |
| Weighted total | 6.1 | 6.7 |
11-2How do pricing and formats compare?
| Question | Conducttr | Cyberbit |
|---|---|---|
| What it sells | Build-and-run crisis exercise platform that simulates news, social media and messaging around the players; the only vendor here with a full public price list. | Cloud cyber range for SOC and IR teams, now combined with RangeForce, with Crisis Sim 360 as an add-on that pulls executives into the same incident. |
| Formats | Tabletop and crisis simulation | Tabletop and crisis simulation, Live-fire range, Hands-on labs |
| Audiences | Executives and board, Incident response team | Executives and board, Incident response team, SOC analysts |
| How it is delivered | Virtual, in-person or hybrid; one team to 1,000+ simultaneous teams | Cloud-based cyber range (Cyberbit Readiness) |
| Free access | Not published | No free tier |
| Published price | £11,950 to £25,725 per year (four team licences, up to 40 participants per session) | Not published |
| Pricing notes | Four team licences published. The Assessment Toolkit (behavioural assessment) is extra, from £4,536 a year. Larger exercises and Conducttr Local are priced on request. | Not published, contact sales. Crisis Sim 360 is sold only as an add-on to a Cyberbit Readiness plan. |
Choose Conducttr if
- You need a published price to budget against before a sales call: Conducttr scores 10 to 1 here.Four licences published, £11,950 to £25,725 a year, each for up to 40 participants per session.
- You need executives, legal, communications and responders in the same exercise: Conducttr scores 8 to 8 here.Runs from one team to 1,000+ simultaneous teams, in person, online or hybrid.
Choose Cyberbit if
- You need hands-on labs or range work for analysts and responders: Cyberbit scores 9 to 1 here.Cloud range with 100+ team exercises and 2,800+ solo labs; RangeForce content uses tools from CrowdStrike, Splunk, Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet and Microsoft.
- You need evidence you can hand to a board, auditor or insurer: Cyberbit scores 7 to 6 here.A shared dashboard scores decision impact on continuity, reputation and response; the page references NIST and the CREW framework.
11-3Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Conducttr or Cyberbit?
On our weights, Cyberbit scores higher (6.7 to 6.1 of 10). Conducttr leads on 1 of seven criteria and Cyberbit on 3; they tie on 3. The better choice depends on your gap: see the criterion table above.
Which is cheaper, Conducttr or Cyberbit?
Conducttr: £11,950 to £25,725 per year (four team licences, up to 40 participants per session). Cyberbit: Not published. Prices in different currencies or units are not directly comparable.
Can you use Conducttr and Cyberbit together?
They overlap on tabletop and crisis simulation, so most teams choose one of them for that format. Cyberbit also sells live-fire range and hands-on labs, which Conducttr does not.
Sources: conducttr.com, conducttr.com/pricing, cyberbit.com, cyberbit.com/product/crisis-simulation, rangeforce.com · Reviewed Sep 2026