Security Training

Compare

Conducttr vs Cytactic

Field note

Conducttr scores higher overall on our weights, 6.5 of 10 to 6.0. Conducttr leads on cross-team (8 to 7), breadth and free access (5 to 3) and pricing (10 to 1); Cytactic leads on effort to run (7 to 5) and hands-on depth (2 to 1). They tie on realism and evidence.

Editorial assessment · Assessed from vendor sites, product pages and published pricing, September 2026

Editorial verdict

Conducttr for a published price to budget against before a sales call; Cytactic for exercises that are quick to prepare, so you can run them often.

11-1How do they score?

Readiness score by criterion (editorial assessment, 0–10)
CriterionConducttrCytactic
Realism (25%)
7Tie
7Tie
Cross-team (25%)
8Higher
7
Evidence (20%)
6Tie
6Tie
Effort to run (15%)
5
7Higher
Hands-on depth (5%)
1
2Higher
Breadth and free access (5%)
5Higher
3
Pricing (5%)
10Higher
1
Weighted total
6.5
6.0

11-2How do pricing and formats compare?

Pricing and formats
QuestionConducttrCytactic
What it sellsBuild-and-run crisis exercise platform that simulates news, social media and messaging around the players; the only vendor here with a full public price list.Cyber incident response management hub with a simulation generator: five ready-made crisis simulations and an AI engine that builds new ones from the organisation's profile.
FormatsTabletop and crisis simulationTabletop and crisis simulation
AudiencesExecutives and board, Incident response teamIncident response team
How it is deliveredVirtual, in-person or hybrid; one team to 1,000+ simultaneous teamsSimulation Mode inside the Cytactic platform
Free accessNot publishedNo free tier
Published price£11,950 to £25,725 per year (four team licences, up to 40 participants per session)Not published
Pricing notesFour team licences published. The Assessment Toolkit (behavioural assessment) is extra, from £4,536 a year. Larger exercises and Conducttr Local are priced on request.Not published, contact sales. Access is through a demo.

Choose Conducttr if

  • You need a published price to budget against before a sales call: Conducttr scores 10 to 1 here.Four licences published, £11,950 to £25,725 a year, each for up to 40 participants per session.
  • You need executives, legal, communications and responders in the same exercise: Conducttr scores 8 to 7 here.Runs from one team to 1,000+ simultaneous teams, in person, online or hybrid.

Choose Cytactic if

  • You need exercises that are quick to prepare, so you can run them often: Cytactic scores 7 to 5 here.Five ready-made simulations plus an AI generator that drafts the scenario, injects, decision points and moderator guidance; a moderator still runs the session.
  • You need hands-on labs or range work for analysts and responders: Cytactic scores 2 to 1 here.No labs, range or hands-on investigation environment is described; team drills cover roles, workflows and tools.

11-3Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Conducttr or Cytactic?

On our weights, Conducttr scores higher (6.5 to 6.0 of 10). Conducttr leads on 3 of seven criteria and Cytactic on 2; they tie on 2. The better choice depends on your gap: see the criterion table above.

Which is cheaper, Conducttr or Cytactic?

Conducttr: £11,950 to £25,725 per year (four team licences, up to 40 participants per session). Cytactic: Not published. Prices in different currencies or units are not directly comparable.

Can you use Conducttr and Cytactic together?

They overlap on tabletop and crisis simulation, so most teams choose one of them for that format.

Sources: conducttr.com, conducttr.com/pricing, cytactic.com, cytactic.com/platform, cytactic.com/blog/the-next-generation-of-cyber-tabletops-is-here-powered-by-ai · Reviewed Sep 2026