Compare
iluminr vs TryHackMe
iluminr scores higher overall on our weights, 6.7 of 10 to 6.5. iluminr leads on realism (7 to 6), cross-team (9 to 5) and evidence (9 to 7); TryHackMe leads on hands-on depth (8 to 2), breadth and free access (9 to 6) and pricing (3 to 1). They tie on effort to run.
Editorial assessment · Assessed from vendor sites, product pages and published pricing, September 2026
Editorial verdict
iluminr for executives, legal, communications and responders in the same exercise; TryHackMe for hands-on labs or range work for analysts and responders.
11-1How do they score?
| Criterion | iluminr | TryHackMe |
|---|---|---|
| Realism (22%) | 7Higher | 6 |
| Cross-team (20%) | 9Higher | 5 |
| Evidence (16%) | 9Higher | 7 |
| Effort to run (14%) | 8Tie | 8Tie |
| Hands-on depth (12%) | 2 | 8Higher |
| Breadth and free access (8%) | 6 | 9Higher |
| Pricing (8%) | 1 | 3Higher |
| Weighted total | 6.7 | 6.5 |
11-2How do pricing and formats compare?
| Question | iluminr | TryHackMe |
|---|---|---|
| What it sells | Operational resilience exercising for boards, executives and crisis teams, from 3–5 minute microsimulations to facilitated tabletops, with evidence mapped to regulations. | Browser-based labs with a free tier and 8M+ users, plus AI-generated tabletop exercises and SOC simulators for business teams. |
| Formats | Tabletop and crisis simulation | Tabletop and crisis simulation, Hands-on labs |
| Audiences | Executives and board, Incident response team, Whole company | Incident response team, SOC analysts |
| How it is delivered | Microsimulations, team exercises and facilitated tabletops | Browser-based labs and simulators |
| Free access | No free tier | Free individual tier |
| Published price | Not published | Individual plans published; business pricing through sales |
| Pricing notes | Not published, contact sales. | Business pricing not published, contact sales. Individual plans are priced publicly. |
Choose iluminr if
- You need executives, legal, communications and responders in the same exercise: iluminr scores 9 to 5 here.Built for boards, executives, crisis teams and risk functions, from single-player microsimulations to multiplayer team drills.
- You need evidence you can hand to a board, auditor or insurer: iluminr scores 9 to 7 here.Board-ready dashboards, benchmarking by department, region and role, and evidence trails for DORA, APRA CPS 230, ISO 22301, NIST CSF and other frameworks.
Choose TryHackMe if
- You need hands-on labs or range work for analysts and responders: TryHackMe scores 8 to 2 here.800+ labs, a SOC Simulator, a Threat Hunting Simulator and Live Breach Exercises.
- You need a large content library, wide audience coverage or a free way in: TryHackMe scores 9 to 6 here.8M+ users and a free individual tier; the largest open community in this set.
11-3Frequently asked questions
Which is better, iluminr or TryHackMe?
On our weights, iluminr scores higher (6.7 to 6.5 of 10). iluminr leads on 3 of seven criteria and TryHackMe on 3; they tie on 1. The better choice depends on your gap: see the criterion table above.
Which is cheaper, iluminr or TryHackMe?
iluminr: Not published. TryHackMe: Individual plans published; business pricing through sales. Prices in different currencies or units are not directly comparable.
Can you use iluminr and TryHackMe together?
They overlap on tabletop and crisis simulation, so most teams choose one of them for that format. TryHackMe also sells hands-on labs, which iluminr does not.
Sources: iluminr.io, iluminr.io/pricing, tryhackme.com/business, tryhackme.com/business/solutions/tabletop-exercises, tryhackme.com/pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026