Security Training

Compare

Cytactic vs Immersive Labs

Field note

Immersive Labs scores higher overall on our weights, 7.6 of 10 to 6.0. Cytactic does not lead on any criterion; Immersive Labs leads on realism (8 to 7), cross-team (8 to 7), evidence (8 to 6), hands-on depth (9 to 2) and breadth and free access (9 to 3). They tie on effort to run and pricing.

Editorial assessment · Assessed from vendor sites, product pages and published pricing, September 2026

Editorial verdict

Cytactic for an exercise that reacts to the decisions your team makes; Immersive Labs for evidence you can hand to a board, auditor or insurer.

11-1How do they score?

Readiness score by criterion (editorial assessment, 0–10)
CriterionCytacticImmersive Labs
Realism (25%)
7
8Higher
Cross-team (25%)
7
8Higher
Evidence (20%)
6
8Higher
Effort to run (15%)
7Tie
7Tie
Hands-on depth (5%)
2
9Higher
Breadth and free access (5%)
3
9Higher
Pricing (5%)
1Tie
1Tie
Weighted total
6.0
7.6

11-2How do pricing and formats compare?

Pricing and formats
QuestionCytacticImmersive Labs
What it sellsCyber incident response management hub with a simulation generator: five ready-made crisis simulations and an AI engine that builds new ones from the organisation's profile.The broadest platform here: hands-on labs, a live-fire range on your own tools, cyber drills and crisis simulations under one product, Immersive One.
FormatsTabletop and crisis simulationTabletop and crisis simulation, Live-fire range, Hands-on labs
AudiencesIncident response teamExecutives and board, Incident response team, SOC analysts, Whole company
How it is deliveredSimulation Mode inside the Cytactic platformBrowser-based platform (Immersive One)
Free accessNo free tierNot published
Published priceNot publishedNot published
Pricing notesNot published, contact sales. Access is through a demo.Not published, contact sales.

Choose Cytactic if

  • You need an exercise that reacts to the decisions your team makes: Cytactic scores 7 to 8 here.Exercises run in a Simulation Mode where attacker emails, ransom notes, breaking news and system data appear automatically, built from the organisation's profile; a scenario that branches on each decision is not described.
  • You need executives, legal, communications and responders in the same exercise: Cytactic scores 7 to 8 here.Generated exercises include stakeholder discussions, with crisis communication and legal disclosure agents in the platform; an exercise format for executives or the board is not described.

Choose Immersive Labs if

  • You need evidence you can hand to a board, auditor or insurer: Immersive Labs scores 8 to 6 here.Decision-level measurement, a Resilience Score, benchmarks across teams and cohorts, and evidence against frameworks such as NIS2 and DORA.
  • You need hands-on labs or range work for analysts and responders: Immersive Labs scores 9 to 2 here.Browser labs against live systems across AI, application, cloud, OT and offensive security; Dynamic Threat Range uses tools such as Sentinel, Elastic, Splunk and CrowdStrike.

11-3Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Cytactic or Immersive Labs?

On our weights, Immersive Labs scores higher (7.6 to 6.0 of 10). Cytactic leads on 0 of seven criteria and Immersive Labs on 5; they tie on 2. The better choice depends on your gap: see the criterion table above.

Which is cheaper, Cytactic or Immersive Labs?

Neither publishes a price, so we cannot say. Ask both for a quote scoped to the same audience and number of exercises.

Can you use Cytactic and Immersive Labs together?

They overlap on tabletop and crisis simulation, so most teams choose one of them for that format. Immersive Labs also sells live-fire range and hands-on labs, which Cytactic does not.

Sources: cytactic.com, cytactic.com/platform, cytactic.com/blog/the-next-generation-of-cyber-tabletops-is-here-powered-by-ai, immersivelabs.com, immersivelabs.com/products/crisis-sim, immersivelabs.com/solutions/digital-tabletop-exercises, immersivelabs.com/solutions/cybersecurity-technical-exercises, immersivelabs.com/solutions/labs · Reviewed Sep 2026