Security Training

Compare

Cytactic vs iluminr

Field note

iluminr scores higher overall on our weights, 7.5 of 10 to 6.0. Cytactic does not lead on any criterion; iluminr leads on cross-team (9 to 7), evidence (9 to 6), effort to run (8 to 7) and breadth and free access (6 to 3). They tie on realism, hands-on depth and pricing.

Editorial assessment · Assessed from vendor sites, product pages and published pricing, September 2026

Editorial verdict

Cytactic for an exercise that reacts to the decisions your team makes; iluminr for evidence you can hand to a board, auditor or insurer.

11-1How do they score?

Readiness score by criterion (editorial assessment, 0–10)
CriterionCytacticiluminr
Realism (25%)
7Tie
7Tie
Cross-team (25%)
7
9Higher
Evidence (20%)
6
9Higher
Effort to run (15%)
7
8Higher
Hands-on depth (5%)
2Tie
2Tie
Breadth and free access (5%)
3
6Higher
Pricing (5%)
1Tie
1Tie
Weighted total
6.0
7.5

11-2How do pricing and formats compare?

Pricing and formats
QuestionCytacticiluminr
What it sellsCyber incident response management hub with a simulation generator: five ready-made crisis simulations and an AI engine that builds new ones from the organisation's profile.Operational resilience exercising for boards, executives and crisis teams, from 3–5 minute microsimulations to facilitated tabletops, with evidence mapped to regulations.
FormatsTabletop and crisis simulationTabletop and crisis simulation
AudiencesIncident response teamExecutives and board, Incident response team, Whole company
How it is deliveredSimulation Mode inside the Cytactic platformMicrosimulations, team exercises and facilitated tabletops
Free accessNo free tierNo free tier
Published priceNot publishedNot published
Pricing notesNot published, contact sales. Access is through a demo.Not published, contact sales.

Choose Cytactic if

  • You need an exercise that reacts to the decisions your team makes: Cytactic scores 7 to 7 here.Exercises run in a Simulation Mode where attacker emails, ransom notes, breaking news and system data appear automatically, built from the organisation's profile; a scenario that branches on each decision is not described.
  • You need executives, legal, communications and responders in the same exercise: Cytactic scores 7 to 9 here.Generated exercises include stakeholder discussions, with crisis communication and legal disclosure agents in the platform; an exercise format for executives or the board is not described.

Choose iluminr if

  • You need evidence you can hand to a board, auditor or insurer: iluminr scores 9 to 6 here.Board-ready dashboards, benchmarking by department, region and role, and evidence trails for DORA, APRA CPS 230, ISO 22301, NIST CSF and other frameworks.
  • You need executives, legal, communications and responders in the same exercise: iluminr scores 9 to 7 here.Built for boards, executives, crisis teams and risk functions, from single-player microsimulations to multiplayer team drills.

11-3Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Cytactic or iluminr?

On our weights, iluminr scores higher (7.5 to 6.0 of 10). Cytactic leads on 0 of seven criteria and iluminr on 4; they tie on 3. The better choice depends on your gap: see the criterion table above.

Which is cheaper, Cytactic or iluminr?

Neither publishes a price, so we cannot say. Ask both for a quote scoped to the same audience and number of exercises.

Can you use Cytactic and iluminr together?

They overlap on tabletop and crisis simulation, so most teams choose one of them for that format.

Sources: cytactic.com, cytactic.com/platform, cytactic.com/blog/the-next-generation-of-cyber-tabletops-is-here-powered-by-ai, iluminr.io, iluminr.io/pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026