Compare
Cyberbit vs TryHackMe
Cyberbit scores higher overall on our weights, 6.7 of 10 to 6.5. Cyberbit leads on realism (7 to 6), cross-team (8 to 5) and hands-on depth (9 to 8); TryHackMe leads on effort to run (8 to 5), breadth and free access (9 to 7) and pricing (3 to 1). They tie on evidence.
Editorial assessment · Assessed from vendor sites, product pages and published pricing, September 2026
Editorial verdict
Cyberbit for executives, legal, communications and responders in the same exercise; TryHackMe for exercises that are quick to prepare, so you can run them often.
11-1How do they score?
| Criterion | Cyberbit | TryHackMe |
|---|---|---|
| Realism (22%) | 7Higher | 6 |
| Cross-team (20%) | 8Higher | 5 |
| Evidence (16%) | 7Tie | 7Tie |
| Effort to run (14%) | 5 | 8Higher |
| Hands-on depth (12%) | 9Higher | 8 |
| Breadth and free access (8%) | 7 | 9Higher |
| Pricing (8%) | 1 | 3Higher |
| Weighted total | 6.7 | 6.5 |
11-2How do pricing and formats compare?
| Question | Cyberbit | TryHackMe |
|---|---|---|
| What it sells | Cloud cyber range for SOC and IR teams, now combined with RangeForce, with Crisis Sim 360 as an add-on that pulls executives into the same incident. | Browser-based labs with a free tier and 8M+ users, plus AI-generated tabletop exercises and SOC simulators for business teams. |
| Formats | Tabletop and crisis simulation, Live-fire range, Hands-on labs | Tabletop and crisis simulation, Hands-on labs |
| Audiences | Executives and board, Incident response team, SOC analysts | Incident response team, SOC analysts |
| How it is delivered | Cloud-based cyber range (Cyberbit Readiness) | Browser-based labs and simulators |
| Free access | No free tier | Free individual tier |
| Published price | Not published | Individual plans published; business pricing through sales |
| Pricing notes | Not published, contact sales. Crisis Sim 360 is sold only as an add-on to a Cyberbit Readiness plan. | Business pricing not published, contact sales. Individual plans are priced publicly. |
Choose Cyberbit if
- You need executives, legal, communications and responders in the same exercise: Cyberbit scores 8 to 5 here.Brings executive, legal, communications, risk and SOC teams into one connected exercise.
- You need an exercise that reacts to the decisions your team makes: Cyberbit scores 7 to 6 here.Crisis Sim 360 supports nonlinear exercises in which each answer changes the next question, and SOC findings trigger executive decisions.
Choose TryHackMe if
- You need exercises that are quick to prepare, so you can run them often: TryHackMe scores 8 to 5 here.The vendor states a 10-minute average launch, with unlimited exercises and participants.
- You need a large content library, wide audience coverage or a free way in: TryHackMe scores 9 to 7 here.8M+ users and a free individual tier; the largest open community in this set.
11-3Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Cyberbit or TryHackMe?
On our weights, Cyberbit scores higher (6.7 to 6.5 of 10). Cyberbit leads on 3 of seven criteria and TryHackMe on 3; they tie on 1. The better choice depends on your gap: see the criterion table above.
Which is cheaper, Cyberbit or TryHackMe?
Cyberbit: Not published. TryHackMe: Individual plans published; business pricing through sales. Prices in different currencies or units are not directly comparable.
Can you use Cyberbit and TryHackMe together?
They overlap on tabletop and crisis simulation and hands-on labs, so most teams choose one of them for that format. Cyberbit also sells live-fire range, which TryHackMe does not.
Sources: cyberbit.com, cyberbit.com/product/crisis-simulation, rangeforce.com, tryhackme.com/business, tryhackme.com/business/solutions/tabletop-exercises, tryhackme.com/pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026