Compare
Cyberbit vs Reflex Security
Reflex Security scores higher overall on our weights, 6.8 of 10 to 6.7. Cyberbit leads on hands-on depth (9 to 2) and breadth and free access (7 to 2); Reflex Security leads on realism (9 to 7), cross-team (9 to 8), evidence (8 to 7) and effort to run (9 to 5). They tie on pricing.
Editorial assessment · Assessed from vendor sites, product pages and published pricing, September 2026
Editorial verdict
Cyberbit for hands-on labs or range work for analysts and responders; Reflex Security for exercises that are quick to prepare, so you can run them often.
11-1How do they score?
| Criterion | Cyberbit | Reflex Security |
|---|---|---|
| Realism (22%) | 7 | 9Higher |
| Cross-team (20%) | 8 | 9Higher |
| Evidence (16%) | 7 | 8Higher |
| Effort to run (14%) | 5 | 9Higher |
| Hands-on depth (12%) | 9Higher | 2 |
| Breadth and free access (8%) | 7Higher | 2 |
| Pricing (8%) | 1Tie | 1Tie |
| Weighted total | 6.7 | 6.8 |
11-2How do pricing and formats compare?
| Question | Cyberbit | Reflex Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it sells | Cloud cyber range for SOC and IR teams, now combined with RangeForce, with Crisis Sim 360 as an add-on that pulls executives into the same incident. | AI crisis simulation that replaces the scripted tabletop: an adaptive adversary, pressured stakeholders and an after-action report at the end. |
| Formats | Tabletop and crisis simulation, Live-fire range, Hands-on labs | Tabletop and crisis simulation |
| Audiences | Executives and board, Incident response team, SOC analysts | Executives and board, Incident response team |
| How it is delivered | Cloud-based cyber range (Cyberbit Readiness) | AI facilitator inside Zoom, Meet or Teams; asynchronous play supported |
| Free access | No free tier | No free tier |
| Published price | Not published | Not published |
| Pricing notes | Not published, contact sales. Crisis Sim 360 is sold only as an add-on to a Cyberbit Readiness plan. | Not published, contact sales. Access is through a demo. |
Choose Cyberbit if
- You need hands-on labs or range work for analysts and responders: Cyberbit scores 9 to 2 here.Cloud range with 100+ team exercises and 2,800+ solo labs; RangeForce content uses tools from CrowdStrike, Splunk, Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet and Microsoft.
- You need a large content library, wide audience coverage or a free way in: Cyberbit scores 7 to 2 here.Deep for SOC and IR teams; little for the wider workforce and no free tier.
Choose Reflex Security if
- You need exercises that are quick to prepare, so you can run them often: Reflex Security scores 9 to 5 here.Scenario in minutes, a sixty-minute session, and an AI facilitator that joins Zoom, Meet or Teams; asynchronous play is supported.
- You need an exercise that reacts to the decisions your team makes: Reflex Security scores 9 to 7 here.Builds the scenario from the organization's public footprint, can add its telemetry, and runs an unscripted AI adversary that reacts to each decision.
11-3Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Cyberbit or Reflex Security?
On our weights, Reflex Security scores higher (6.8 to 6.7 of 10). Cyberbit leads on 2 of seven criteria and Reflex Security on 4; they tie on 1. The better choice depends on your gap: see the criterion table above.
Which is cheaper, Cyberbit or Reflex Security?
Neither publishes a price, so we cannot say. Ask both for a quote scoped to the same audience and number of exercises.
Can you use Cyberbit and Reflex Security together?
They overlap on tabletop and crisis simulation, so most teams choose one of them for that format. Cyberbit also sells live-fire range and hands-on labs, which Reflex Security does not.
Sources: cyberbit.com, cyberbit.com/product/crisis-simulation, rangeforce.com, reflexsecurity.io, reflexsecurity.io/blog/reflex-security-vs-immersive-labs, reflexsecurity.io/blog/alternatives · Reviewed Sep 2026