Compare
Cyberbit vs Immersive Labs
Immersive Labs scores higher overall on our weights, 7.5 of 10 to 6.7. Cyberbit does not lead on any criterion; Immersive Labs leads on realism (8 to 7), evidence (8 to 7), effort to run (7 to 5) and breadth and free access (9 to 7). They tie on cross-team, hands-on depth and pricing.
Editorial assessment · Assessed from vendor sites, product pages and published pricing, September 2026
Editorial verdict
Cyberbit for hands-on labs or range work for analysts and responders; Immersive Labs for exercises that are quick to prepare, so you can run them often.
11-1How do they score?
| Criterion | Cyberbit | Immersive Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Realism (22%) | 7 | 8Higher |
| Cross-team (20%) | 8Tie | 8Tie |
| Evidence (16%) | 7 | 8Higher |
| Effort to run (14%) | 5 | 7Higher |
| Hands-on depth (12%) | 9Tie | 9Tie |
| Breadth and free access (8%) | 7 | 9Higher |
| Pricing (8%) | 1Tie | 1Tie |
| Weighted total | 6.7 | 7.5 |
11-2How do pricing and formats compare?
| Question | Cyberbit | Immersive Labs |
|---|---|---|
| What it sells | Cloud cyber range for SOC and IR teams, now combined with RangeForce, with Crisis Sim 360 as an add-on that pulls executives into the same incident. | The broadest platform here: hands-on labs, a live-fire range on your own tools, cyber drills and crisis simulations under one product, Immersive One. |
| Formats | Tabletop and crisis simulation, Live-fire range, Hands-on labs | Tabletop and crisis simulation, Live-fire range, Hands-on labs |
| Audiences | Executives and board, Incident response team, SOC analysts | Executives and board, Incident response team, SOC analysts, Whole company |
| How it is delivered | Cloud-based cyber range (Cyberbit Readiness) | Browser-based platform (Immersive One) |
| Free access | No free tier | Not published |
| Published price | Not published | Not published |
| Pricing notes | Not published, contact sales. Crisis Sim 360 is sold only as an add-on to a Cyberbit Readiness plan. | Not published, contact sales. |
Choose Cyberbit if
- You need hands-on labs or range work for analysts and responders: Cyberbit scores 9 to 9 here.Cloud range with 100+ team exercises and 2,800+ solo labs; RangeForce content uses tools from CrowdStrike, Splunk, Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet and Microsoft.
- You need executives, legal, communications and responders in the same exercise: Cyberbit scores 8 to 8 here.Brings executive, legal, communications, risk and SOC teams into one connected exercise.
Choose Immersive Labs if
- You need exercises that are quick to prepare, so you can run them often: Immersive Labs scores 7 to 5 here.AI Program Builder drafts scenarios in minutes, but a multi-product platform needs more program ownership than a single-purpose tool.
- You need an exercise that reacts to the decisions your team makes: Immersive Labs scores 8 to 7 here.Crisis simulations with dynamic injects and AI actors players can question, built around the customer's playbooks; a separate range runs live attacks on the customer's own tools.
11-3Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Cyberbit or Immersive Labs?
On our weights, Immersive Labs scores higher (7.5 to 6.7 of 10). Cyberbit leads on 0 of seven criteria and Immersive Labs on 4; they tie on 3. The better choice depends on your gap: see the criterion table above.
Which is cheaper, Cyberbit or Immersive Labs?
Neither publishes a price, so we cannot say. Ask both for a quote scoped to the same audience and number of exercises.
Can you use Cyberbit and Immersive Labs together?
They overlap on tabletop and crisis simulation, live-fire range and hands-on labs, so most teams choose one of them for that format.
Sources: cyberbit.com, cyberbit.com/product/crisis-simulation, rangeforce.com, immersivelabs.com, immersivelabs.com/products/crisis-sim, immersivelabs.com/solutions/digital-tabletop-exercises, immersivelabs.com/solutions/cybersecurity-technical-exercises, immersivelabs.com/solutions/labs · Reviewed Sep 2026