Compare
Cyberbit vs iluminr
Cyberbit and iluminr tie at 6.7 of 10 on our weights. Cyberbit leads on hands-on depth (9 to 2) and breadth and free access (7 to 6); iluminr leads on cross-team (9 to 8), evidence (9 to 7) and effort to run (8 to 5). They tie on realism and pricing.
Editorial assessment · Assessed from vendor sites, product pages and published pricing, September 2026
Editorial verdict
Cyberbit for hands-on labs or range work for analysts and responders; iluminr for exercises that are quick to prepare, so you can run them often.
11-1How do they score?
| Criterion | Cyberbit | iluminr |
|---|---|---|
| Realism (22%) | 7Tie | 7Tie |
| Cross-team (20%) | 8 | 9Higher |
| Evidence (16%) | 7 | 9Higher |
| Effort to run (14%) | 5 | 8Higher |
| Hands-on depth (12%) | 9Higher | 2 |
| Breadth and free access (8%) | 7Higher | 6 |
| Pricing (8%) | 1Tie | 1Tie |
| Weighted total | 6.7 | 6.7 |
11-2How do pricing and formats compare?
| Question | Cyberbit | iluminr |
|---|---|---|
| What it sells | Cloud cyber range for SOC and IR teams, now combined with RangeForce, with Crisis Sim 360 as an add-on that pulls executives into the same incident. | Operational resilience exercising for boards, executives and crisis teams, from 3–5 minute microsimulations to facilitated tabletops, with evidence mapped to regulations. |
| Formats | Tabletop and crisis simulation, Live-fire range, Hands-on labs | Tabletop and crisis simulation |
| Audiences | Executives and board, Incident response team, SOC analysts | Executives and board, Incident response team, Whole company |
| How it is delivered | Cloud-based cyber range (Cyberbit Readiness) | Microsimulations, team exercises and facilitated tabletops |
| Free access | No free tier | No free tier |
| Published price | Not published | Not published |
| Pricing notes | Not published, contact sales. Crisis Sim 360 is sold only as an add-on to a Cyberbit Readiness plan. | Not published, contact sales. |
Choose Cyberbit if
- You need hands-on labs or range work for analysts and responders: Cyberbit scores 9 to 2 here.Cloud range with 100+ team exercises and 2,800+ solo labs; RangeForce content uses tools from CrowdStrike, Splunk, Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet and Microsoft.
- You need a large content library, wide audience coverage or a free way in: Cyberbit scores 7 to 6 here.Deep for SOC and IR teams; little for the wider workforce and no free tier.
Choose iluminr if
- You need exercises that are quick to prepare, so you can run them often: iluminr scores 8 to 5 here.3–5 minute individual microsimulations and 30–45 minute team exercises make frequent practice practical.
- You need evidence you can hand to a board, auditor or insurer: iluminr scores 9 to 7 here.Board-ready dashboards, benchmarking by department, region and role, and evidence trails for DORA, APRA CPS 230, ISO 22301, NIST CSF and other frameworks.
11-3Frequently asked questions
Which is better, Cyberbit or iluminr?
They tie at 6.7 of 10 on our weights. Cyberbit leads on 2 of seven criteria and iluminr on 3; they tie on 2. The better choice depends on your gap: see the criterion table above.
Which is cheaper, Cyberbit or iluminr?
Neither publishes a price, so we cannot say. Ask both for a quote scoped to the same audience and number of exercises.
Can you use Cyberbit and iluminr together?
They overlap on tabletop and crisis simulation, so most teams choose one of them for that format. Cyberbit also sells live-fire range and hands-on labs, which iluminr does not.
Sources: cyberbit.com, cyberbit.com/product/crisis-simulation, rangeforce.com, iluminr.io, iluminr.io/pricing · Reviewed Sep 2026