Compare
BreachRx vs Cyberbit
Cyberbit scores higher overall on our weights, 6.8 of 10 to 6.5. BreachRx leads on effort to run (7 to 5); Cyberbit leads on hands-on depth (9 to 2) and breadth and free access (7 to 3). They tie on realism, cross-team, evidence and pricing.
Editorial assessment · Assessed from vendor sites, product pages and published pricing, September 2026
Editorial verdict
BreachRx for exercises that are quick to prepare, so you can run them often; Cyberbit for hands-on labs or range work for analysts and responders.
11-1How do they score?
| Criterion | BreachRx | Cyberbit |
|---|---|---|
| Realism (25%) | 7Tie | 7Tie |
| Cross-team (25%) | 8Tie | 8Tie |
| Evidence (20%) | 7Tie | 7Tie |
| Effort to run (15%) | 7Higher | 5 |
| Hands-on depth (5%) | 2 | 9Higher |
| Breadth and free access (5%) | 3 | 7Higher |
| Pricing (5%) | 1Tie | 1Tie |
| Weighted total | 6.5 | 6.8 |
11-2How do pricing and formats compare?
| Question | BreachRx | Cyberbit |
|---|---|---|
| What it sells | Incident response management platform whose AI Tabletops run exercises in the same system used for live response, then feed the gaps back into playbooks and owners. | Cloud cyber range for SOC and IR teams, now combined with RangeForce, with Crisis Sim 360 as an add-on that pulls executives into the same incident. |
| Formats | Tabletop and crisis simulation | Tabletop and crisis simulation, Live-fire range, Hands-on labs |
| Audiences | Executives and board, Incident response team | Executives and board, Incident response team, SOC analysts |
| How it is delivered | Inside the Rex Platform, with AI-generated moderator guides | Cloud-based cyber range (Cyberbit Readiness) |
| Free access | No free tier; a free, facilitated exercise for qualifying healthcare providers (October 2026) | No free tier |
| Published price | Not published | Not published |
| Pricing notes | Not published, contact sales. Access is through a demo. | Not published, contact sales. Crisis Sim 360 is sold only as an add-on to a Cyberbit Readiness plan. |
Choose BreachRx if
- You need exercises that are quick to prepare, so you can run them often: BreachRx scores 7 to 5 here.The Exercise Agent generates moderator guides, timelines, injects and participant materials, and the vendor names a monthly or biweekly cadence; a human moderator still runs the session.
- You need executives, legal, communications and responders in the same exercise: BreachRx scores 8 to 8 here.Enterprise-wide exercises for security, legal, privacy, IT, communications, risk, business leaders, executives and outside partners, or focused micro-exercises for one team.
Choose Cyberbit if
- You need hands-on labs or range work for analysts and responders: Cyberbit scores 9 to 2 here.Cloud range with 100+ team exercises and 2,800+ solo labs; RangeForce content uses tools from CrowdStrike, Splunk, Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet and Microsoft.
- You need a large content library, wide audience coverage or a free way in: Cyberbit scores 7 to 3 here.Deep for SOC and IR teams; little for the wider workforce and no free tier.
11-3Frequently asked questions
Which is better, BreachRx or Cyberbit?
On our weights, Cyberbit scores higher (6.8 to 6.5 of 10). BreachRx leads on 1 of seven criteria and Cyberbit on 2; they tie on 4. The better choice depends on your gap: see the criterion table above.
Which is cheaper, BreachRx or Cyberbit?
Neither publishes a price, so we cannot say. Ask both for a quote scoped to the same audience and number of exercises.
Can you use BreachRx and Cyberbit together?
They overlap on tabletop and crisis simulation, so most teams choose one of them for that format. Cyberbit also sells live-fire range and hands-on labs, which BreachRx does not.
Sources: breachrx.com, breachrx.com/rex-platform/ai-tabletops, breachrx.com/rex-platform/rex-agentic-ai, breachrx.com/rex-platform/integrations, cyberbit.com, cyberbit.com/product/crisis-simulation, rangeforce.com · Reviewed Sep 2026